Enriched cohesive infinity toposes

Comments first published

I gave a talk in the Advanced Topology Class at Oxford about “Generalized Differential Cohomology” based on this book. Part of the talk required setting up an “enriched cohesive \infty-topos”. Here’s an outline of what that object could be and what it does.

The definitionPermalink

Recall, an VV-enriched topos is a reflective subcategory of a category of VV-presheafs with left exact reflector. Replacing “categories” by “\infty-categories” should similarly define a VV-enriched \infty-topos.

Example. Stable \infty-categories are exactly spectra-enriched \infty-topoi.

Every VV-enriched (\infty-)topos TT has a global section functor given by the homs out of the terminal object \ast, and usually defnied by ΓHom(,):TV\Gamma_\ast \equiv \mathrm{Hom}(\ast,-) : T \to V. This has a left adjoint Γ:VT\Gamma_\ast : V \to T called the constant sheaf functor. Together these functors form the (VV-enriched) terminal geometric morphism.

Now, a VV-enriched \infty-topos is cohesive if the constanst sheaf functor has a further left adjoint (the geometric realization functor Γ!\Gamma_{!}), and the global section functor has a further right adjoint (the codiscrete functor Γ!\Gamma^{!}), satisfying the following properties (both of which will be revisited in our example below): geometric realization must preserve finite products, and both the constant sheaf functor and the codiscrete functor must be fully faithful.

The examplePermalink

To see what an enriched cohesive \infty-topos does, let’s run through an example. The example we will consider will be a sheaf topos.

Remark. In ordinary 1-topos theory, 1-sheaf toposes (that is, categories of sheafs on a category with a Grothendieck topology, i.e. a site) corresponds to 1-toposes defined as left exact localizations of presheaf 1-toposes. However, in \infty-land it seems a bit more care needs to be taken (as Andre Henriques pointed out): it is only the so-called “topological localizations” that corresponds to Grothendieck topologies (see [2]). It is known that a general \infty-topos can at least be canonically presented as a topological followed by a “cotopological” localization (a cotopological localization localizes at “\infty-connected morphisms”). Rezk further notes in [2] that it seems to be an open question whether any \infty-topos can be presented as a topological localization of a presheaf category in some other way.

These difficulties aside, the example we will consider is the spectra-enriched cohesive \infty-sheaf topos of differential manifolds ShSp(Mfld)\mathrm{Sh}^{\mathcal{Sp}}(\mathsf{Mfld}) (with Grothendieck topology given by the usual notion of open covers).

The global section functorPermalink

The terminal object is the presheafs represented by the terminal manifold, i.e. the point. By the Yoneda lemma, the global section functor is thus evaluation on the point. We write this as:

Γ=ev:ShSp(Mfld)Sp.\Gamma_\ast = \mathrm{ev}_\ast : \mathrm{Sh}^{\mathcal{Sp}}(\mathsf{Mfld}) \to \mathcal{Sp}.

The constant sheaf functorPermalink

To motivate the form of the constant sheaf functor, it makes sense to go back to “original idea” of a site, namely, the site of open sets on a topological space XX. In this case, the constant (Set\mathrm{Set}-valued) sheaf functor takes a Set SS to the sheaf given by the trivial etale map p:X×SXp : X \times S \to X. The resulting sheafs maps an open set UXU \subset X to the global sections of the restriction of pp to UU; this is the cotensor Sπ0US^{\pi_0 U} (where π0U\pi_0 U are the connected components of UU). In other word Γ\Gamma^\ast is the sheaf mapping USπ0UU \mapsto S^{\pi_0 U}. This generalizes to our context of \infty-sheafs on manifolds with open covers as follows (see [1]): the constant sheaf functor

Γ:SpShSp(Mfld)\Gamma^\ast : \mathcal{Sp} \to \mathrm{Sh}^{\mathcal{Sp}}(\mathsf{Mfld})

maps SS to the sheaf MSΠMM \mapsto S^{\Pi_\infty M}, where ΠM\Pi_\infty M is the underlying \infty-groupoid of MM, and SΠMS^{\Pi_\infty M} is the cotensor of spectra over spaces. (Andre Henriques points out that, heuristically, a similar observation should hold for many other types of “sheaves on categories of locally contractible topological things”.)

The geometric realization functorPermalink

The geometric realization functor is the left adjoint to the constant sheaf functor. We can compute that using coend calculus.

ShSp(Mfld)(F,ΓS)=MSp(FM,SΠM)=MSp(ΠMFM,S)=Sp(MΠMFM,S)\begin{align} \mathrm{Sh}^{\mathcal{Sp}}(\mathsf{Mfld})(F,\Gamma^\ast S) &= \int_M \mathcal{Sp}(FM,S^{\Pi_\infty M}) \nonumber \\ &= \int_M \mathcal{Sp}(\Pi_\infty M \cdot FM,S) \nonumber \\ &= \mathcal{Sp}(\int^M \Pi_\infty M \cdot FM,S) \nonumber \end{align}

Thus Γ!M=MΠMFM\Gamma_! M = \int^M \Pi_\infty M \cdot FM which indeed looks like the colimit computing a geometric realization (since manifold are glued together from simplices, it can be further rewritten as Γ!M=ΔiFΔi\Gamma_! M = \int^{\Delta^i} F \Delta^i and thus as colimΔFΔi\mathrm{colim}_{\Delta} F \Delta^i). As usual geometric realization preserves finite products.

The codiscrete functorPermalink

For our example it is not too hard to verify (see [1]) that the codiscrete functor is given by Γ!S=Spt(S)\Gamma^! S = S^{\mathrm{pt}(S)} where pt(S)\mathrm{pt}(S) is the set of points of MM. In this sense, Γ!\Gamma^! extracts the “opposite” information from MM than Γ\Gamma^* does (instead of dropping the set, it drops the topology), and then cotensors SS with it as before. More generally, the role of the codiscrete functor is to give us a notion of concrete objects in an cohesive \infty-topos.

ReferencesPermalink

[1] “Differential Cohomology: Categories, Characteristic Classes, and Connections”, Amabel + Debray + Haine, 2021

[2] “Lectures on Higher Topos Theory”, Rezk, 2019

[3] Handwritten illegible notes